Skip to content
Case Studies

One engineered change. One big number.

Real operations, real money saved. Every story starts with a load that was costing more than anyone realised.

Measured at the plant

Same pallet. Same machine. A third of the film.

Toreto wrapped the same pallet with each film in turn — same machine, same power stretch and tension settings — then weighed the film used and measured how well the load was held. The solid films ran their normal wrap configuration; Supersonic and Aerosonic ran roughly 50% fewer revolutions, so the same wrapper puts out twice as many pallets in a shift.

66 g

of Supersonic per pallet, against 200 g of 23µ solid wrap — at the same load stability

Load-stability testing at the Gilau plant: a digital force gauge measures how hard the wrap holds a pallet, in kilograms per square inch

Load-stability testing at the Gilau plant: a digital force gauge measures how hard the wrap holds a pallet, in kilograms per square inch

Toreto's own comparative wrap tests, August 2026. Costs are approximate and vary with film price and pallet size.
FilmLoad stabilityFilm usedCost to wrap
23µ solid, 250% power stretch9.9 kg/sq in200 g€0.48
20µ solid, 250% power stretch9.9 kg/sq in174 g€0.42
17µ solid, 250% power stretch9.9 kg/sq in140 g€0.37
12µ nano, 250% power stretch7.6 kg/sq in91 g€0.32
12µ nano, double-wrapped11.9 kg/sq in182 g€0.64
Supersonic / Aerosonic 16µToreto10 kg/sq in66 g€0.32
Why nano film ends up costing more, not less

On its own, 12µ nano held 7.6 kg/sq in — the weakest result in the test. Nano is a fine-tuned film that depends on a perfect machine and perfect settings; when anything is off, it fails easily. In practice most users end up double-wrapping. That holds the load (11.9), but it now costs €0.64 a pallet and halves throughput: 50% slower and 50% more expensive than Supersonic at €0.32.

Solid or breathable, the same cost to wrap

Supersonic (solid) and Aerosonic (macroperforated, breathable) are made from the same materials and perform the same, so you can switch between them at the same cost per pallet and on the same machine settings. Other breathable films on the market typically cost up to 100% more in use, and need their own settings to perform adequately.

  • The force gauge pulling against Supersonic on a wrapped pallet during the comparative wrap tests
    The force gauge pulling against Supersonic on a wrapped pallet during the comparative wrap tests
  • A hand pressing into the top corner of a pallet wrapped in reinforced film — the load does not give
    A hand pressing into the top corner of a pallet wrapped in reinforced film — the load does not give
  • Close-up of the reinforcing lines running through the film on a wrapped load
    Close-up of the reinforcing lines running through the film on a wrapped load
  • The edge of a pallet wrapped in reinforced film, checked by hand after wrapping
    The edge of a pallet wrapped in reinforced film, checked by hand after wrapping
  • Aerosonic on a wrapped load with the aeration holes opened up by power pre-stretching
    Aerosonic on a wrapped load with the aeration holes opened up by power pre-stretching
  • A Supersonic-wrapped pallet corner where the film has split — and the tear has stopped dead, held by the reinforcing lines instead of running on into the web
    A Supersonic-wrapped pallet corner where the film has split — and the tear has stopped dead, held by the reinforcing lines instead of running on into the web
Reliability, economy, sustainability and performance — the strengthened films are clearly the best value in the market.
Measured in the field — United Kingdom, August 2026

A pallet the machine could not hold. Rewrapped by hand in one minute.

This pallet arrived from a factory machine-wrapped, with the film failed in several places. It is a hard load to wrap — large gaps and very sharp corners. Andy Chinnery took the film off it, weighed it, and rewrapped the same pallet by hand with the Hyper Wrap System. Both lines in the table are cut-and-weigh measurements taken that day.

The pallet as it arrived from the factory, machine-wrapped over its own strapping — the stack leaning and the film loose across the boxesAs it arrived
Machine-wrapped at the factory, with several film failures. The film that came off it weighed 181 g.
The same pallet rewrapped by hand with the Hyper Wrap System: the film sits tight and unbroken across the whole loadRewrapped with Hyper Wrap
The same pallet, rewrapped by hand. It looks like there is more film on it and there are far fewer failures on the sharp edges — in fact 50% fewer metres went on, because the film is stronger and wider.
One minute, one take, no cuts

Andy filmed the whole wrap in one go. The clip is 62 seconds long because that is how long the pallet took — nothing is sped up and nothing is edited out. Watch how little effort goes into the tension: the dispenser does it.

−26%

off the cost of wrapping the same pallet — £1.00 down to £0.74, in half the time

Andy Chinnery's own field test, United Kingdom, August 2026. The 181 g is the film measured off the pallet as it arrived; labour on both lines is the same operative at £0.20 a minute, the rate he confirmed on 19 August. Costs are approximate and vary with film price, labour rate and pallet size.
MethodFilm usedFilm costWrap timeLabourTotal per pallet
Conventional hand stretch film181 g£0.602 min£0.40£1.00
Hyper Wrap SystemToreto151 g£0.541 min£0.20£0.74
Fewer metres, not thinner film

The saving is in metres, not microns. Half as many revolutions went onto the pallet, because the film is at least twice as strong and wider — so the weight only falls from 181 g to 151 g while the length applied halves. Buying film by the micron would have missed this entirely.

What the minute is worth

Two minutes down to one takes 20p off every pallet on labour alone — and it is either twice as many pallets out of the warehouse in the same shift, or the same output with up to 50% fewer people on the job. On a large site that number dwarfs the film saving.

As a reminder, I am 64 years old and have a bad back, yet I still achieved an excellent result with ease.
Andy Chinnery · Managing Partner, Toreto Packaging Innovations UK
Tension and puncture resistance

Andy's own frames from the same pallet: film drawn tight over sharp carton corners without snapping, and tension adjusted by hand throughout the wrap.

The face of the finished pallet close up: the carton markings still legible through the film, every strand under even tension
The finished wrap, close up. Andy's own frame, 18 August 2026.
  • The film fanning out into dozens of strands under a hand pulling it off the load, every strand stretching and not one of them breaking
    The film fanning out into dozens of strands under a hand pulling it off the load, every strand stretching and not one of them breaking
  • A hand gripping the applied Hyper Wrap film at the side of the load and pulling it away — the film stretches instead of tearing
    A hand gripping the applied Hyper Wrap film at the side of the load and pulling it away — the film stretches instead of tearing
  • The film so evenly tensioned across the cartons that the barcodes underneath can still be scanned through it
    The film so evenly tensioned across the cartons that the barcodes underneath can still be scanned through it
  • Hyper Wrap film drawn tight around the sharp corner of a stack of cartons without splitting
    Hyper Wrap film drawn tight around the sharp corner of a stack of cartons without splitting
  • The corner of the rewrapped pallet: the film taut against sharp carton edges with no tear running into the web
    The corner of the rewrapped pallet: the film taut against sharp carton edges with no tear running into the web
  • Hyper Wrap film over a pallet corner, holding the load's own strapping tight underneath it
    Hyper Wrap film over a pallet corner, holding the load's own strapping tight underneath it
  • Film drawn over a length of timber standing proud of the load, taking the shape of it without splitting
    Film drawn over a length of timber standing proud of the load, taking the shape of it without splitting
  • Hyper Wrap film pulled tight around the bottom corner of the load and down onto the pallet itself
    Hyper Wrap film pulled tight around the bottom corner of the load and down onto the pallet itself
  • Hyper Wrap film lifted at the top of the load, showing how it is drawn over the top edge of the cartons and back down
    Hyper Wrap film lifted at the top of the load, showing how it is drawn over the top edge of the cartons and back down
Photography and film by Andy Chinnery, 18–19 August 2026, from his own originals.
Food & Beverage
Condensation eliminated
<0.5% damage, stable double-stacking
Problem

Hot-filled bottles sweated under solid wrap; rusting crowns and ruined labels drove damage above 2%.

Solution

Switched to Aerosonic with reinforced edges. Loads now breathe, cool dry and double-stack — damage under 0.5%.

Beverage Producer
Industrial
58% less film
per pallet, same containment
Problem

Heavy sacks were over-wrapped with thick commodity film to stop collapse.

Solution

Supersonic held the loads with far less material — a 58% film reduction.

Pet Food Manufacturer
Fresh Produce
Rejections cut
spoilage & customs holds down
Problem

Solid wrap restricted airflow; spoilage and fruit-fly customs rejections at destination.

Solution

Aerosonic kept produce fresh and pest-free through inspection.

Fresh Produce Exporter
Frozen & Cold-Chain
35% faster freezing
plastic use halved
Problem

Solid film slowed blast-freezing and used heavy plastic per pallet.

Solution

Aerosonic let cold air reach the product — 35% faster freeze, plastic halved.

Frozen Bakery
Logistics
£20,000 saved/yr
on wrap and damage combined
Problem

High cost-per-pallet and frequent re-wrapping across a busy depot.

Solution

Engineered reinforced film cut consumption and damage — a £20,000 annual saving.

Catering Wholesaler
Industrial
~£96,000/yr
40% less film at 20,000 pallets/mo
Problem

Pallets collapsing in transit at 20,000 pallets a month, with runaway film cost.

Solution

Supersonic cut film 40% and stopped collapse — saving roughly £96,000 a year.

Heavy Industrial
IllustrativeFigures indicative — confirmed at quotation.

See where your wrapping operation is leaking money.

Request an audit — we will measure your true cost-per-pallet and show you the number you are missing.

Request an audit
We value your privacy

We use strictly-necessary cookies to run the site, plus optional cookies to measure traffic and improve Toreto. You choose what to allow.